AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine was claimed to be 79% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 cases when tested in a study of more than 30,000 people. But, just hours after this report, the Data and Safety Monitoring board of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases “expressed concern that AstraZeneca may have included outdated information from that trial, which may have provided an incomplete view of the efficacy data.”
FREE Report: Censored COVID Treatments
life-saving protocols Big Pharma does NOT want you to know
Could that incomplete data be one reason the AstraZeneca vaccine was suspended in numerous countries due to blood clots? And what exactly is the “outdated information” from the trial? Also, how long exactly does the claimed 79% effectiveness rate last, and under what conditions? Are you willing to get rushed vaccines backed up by incomplete data with unknown long term side effects?
Now, the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will be reviewing the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine to determine usage guidelines within the United States.
Have you ever questioned why food and drugs are lumped into one administration? And can the FDA and CDC actually provide a reputable review of this vaccine? The CDC already reported that mask mandates aren’t that effective against COVID. So why are medical mandates being pushed? The CDC also reported that vaccines won’t eliminate the need for lockdowns and physical distancing. So then is this really all a push for promoting health or control?
Can we really trust these entities to tell us what vaccine is actually safe? Can drugging the body actually lead to healing the body? Could this all be a ploy to make people forget about their own body’s natural healing capabilities?
(2021, March 23). AstraZeneca May Have Used Outdated Info in Vaccine Trial | Newsmax.com. Retrieved from https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/astrazeneca-vaccine-trial-outdated-info/2021/03/23/id/1014790/